hmm, right I guess I did not express my self correct as usual:)
I wanted to be able to create a model something like this(my memory of
the generics part are little vague now so bear over with me)..:
new LoadableDetachableModel(cat){
public void LoadableDetachableModel(<E> type)
{
}
}
hmm thinking over it, you might be right I cant exactly see how generics solves
any of this part, since we need to reduce to some sort of id when we detach
anyways..
These Saturday half thought through thoughts:)
Johan Compagner wrote:
what is wrong with the LoadableDetachableModel that has an abstract load()
method that we have now
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So is there any?
Basicly we could almost get away with having only one model for this I
guess? Making the load method abstract...
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
