then people will complain that the util providers we provide implement the default rather then the double one...
same problem -igor On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Jan Kriesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi igor, > > > > > > > > - - have IDataProvider one generic for iterator and one for model. > > > > > then 99% of people out there have to declare a redundant type. > > > > one could actually have a utility interface to avoid redundant types: > > interface idefaultdataprovider<t> extends idataprovider<t,t> > > and everyone could be happy, not? > > best regards, --- jan. > > >
