The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the SCM links get messed up when you do that.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tough to be sure - we could experiment. > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't >> inherit correctly, though. Right? >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms >> > correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom >> > for all projects. >> > >> > Martijn >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Devs, >> >> In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed >> a >> >> Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several >> >> Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most >> >> projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly >> >> configured. >> >> >> >> I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the >> >> projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this >> >> Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run >> it >> >> past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it >> run >> >> for a while as a test. >> >> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jeremy Thomerson >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >> > Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released >> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. >> > >> > > > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com >
