I am 0 but leaning towards -1 because i really dont like renaming IModel to Model, because that would cause many weird things/compile problems in my project, and i think thats would be the same for others.
Besides that i agree with martijn that then all the books and documentations are 1 one blow depricated.. But if there are really many people for the change i wil not veto it or something. I only do think it brings more trouble then it fixes. On 06/10/2009, Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: > So, I've tried to do a tally of the informal votes (since this was a > discussion thread). There ended up being a lot of noise on the thread, so I > may not have got every vote since some were throwing votes in for renaming > model, etc. Anyway, here's what we came up with: > > FOR (2 binding / approximately 9 non-binding): > Matej Knopp > Igor Vaynberg > > > AGAINST (3 binding / approximately 9 non-binding): > Martijn Dashorst > Jeremy Thomerson > Eelco Hillenius > > NO VOTE: > Johan Compagner (commented on thread, but I wasn't sure what vote was > - I think he was voting on model thing) > Upayavira Alex Karasulu Ate Douma Gwyn Evans Jonathan > Locke Juergen Donnerstag Janne Hietamäki Frank Bille Jensen Al > Maw Jean-Baptiste Quenot Gerolf Seitz Timo Rantalaiho > > So, can we please all go use our time to look at the *much more important* > URL refactoring? Or do we want to continue discussing a divided subject? > > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com >
