On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:51 PM, James Carman <[email protected]> wrote: > While only committers have binding votes, all votes from the community > should be (and certainly are) considered.
True. Though I value folks that actually test the release higher than a +1 that arrives within 2 hours of the start of a vote. I encourage anyone to vote when they have actually tested the release (download/checkout the sources, run a maven build, click through the examples or test it with your own application). A +1 just because you want a new version only muddies the result and is not as helpful. > That isn't to say that > these VOTE threads should be on the users@ list. If a user is > interested enough in the development of the Wicket project, they > should subscribe to the dev@ list also. We don't want to spam the > users@ list with stuff most users don't care about. True. For important issues, such as major API breaks (like generics, or constructor change) we always consult the community at large instead of just d...@. Martijn
