My vote is -1. Unless we have a good way to prove the problem, not only theoretical presumption, we shouldn't revert it in next release. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/vote-Revert-WICKET-2846-tp2226987p2229151.html Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: [vote] Revert WICKE... Alex Objelean
- Re: [vote] Revert W... James Carman
- Re: [vote] Revert W... James Carman
- Re: [vote] Revert WICKET-284... Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
- Re: [vote] Revert WICKE... Alex Objelean
- Re: [vote] Revert W... Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
- Re: [vote] Revert W... Alex Objelean
- Re: [vote] Revert W... James Carman
- Re: [vote] Revert W... James Carman
- Re: [vote] Revert WICKET-2846 Johan Compagner
- Re: [vote] Revert WICKET-2846 Alex Objelean
- Re: [vote] Revert WICKET-2846 James Carman
- Re: [vote] Revert WICKET-2846 Jeremy Thomerson
