Why do we want already tomcat 7, which is still in a first? beta? Why not the latest stable 6? Is it really faster and better? (I havent really looked into 7 yet will do asap)
----- Original message ----- > OK seems to be a tomcat 7 incompatibility of hudson... > > Martijn > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst > <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > installing hudson 1.367 doesn't seem to work properly. I get 404 > > errors on the homepage, users page and other pages. > > > > Asking around on #hudson on irc hasn't yielded a response... > > > > Martijn > > > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Martijn Dashorst > > <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > As you might have noticed, I've done a bit of preparing for our > > > migration to hudson... > > > > > > Tomcat -> 7.0 > > > Java -> 1.6 (otherwise tomcat doesn't run) > > > > > > I had to tweak the tomcat configuration to ensure that confluence > > > would start up: added the missing drivers from the previous tomcat > > > installation's lib folder, and fixed some startup parameters in > > > catalina.sh > > > > > > Next: installing hudson. > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > -- > > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: > > > http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety > > > for web applications Get it now: > > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8 > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > > Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8 > > > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8
