since this has turned into more of a vote should we take it to the
user list so we get a wider range of responses?

-igor

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for Johan's changes to make the surface area of the change smaller.
>
> I didn't find onInitialize and onConfigure in our code base as well.
>
> The benefits are evident. So that is +0 from me to keep them in.
> Pushing them to only 1.5 ensures we get enough folks trying 1.5 though
> :)
>
> Martijn
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Johan Compagner <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> we (servoy) dont care much about those changes, they can be left in
>> (we dont use it and they also dont give us a problem (after my fix ;)
>> )
>>
>>
>> the only problem is by the way onInitialize and onConfigure()
>>
>> Because initialize and also doInitialize() are package scope so they
>> are not a problem as far as i know... for example doinitialize() is
>> final but a subclass of component in another package can just create
>> such a method just fine...
>>
>> configure() you made public final.. i think we just should do the
>> same, make it package scope final...
>> then that method shouldnt also be a big problem.
>>
>> The it is just the 2 overridable protected methods onInitialize and 
>> onConfigure
>>
>> johan
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 19:33, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> i just thought of something, i added oninitialize and onconfigure
>>> features to 1.4.x as well as trunk, but they can create an
>>> incompatibility for 1.4.x users if they have declared a method on
>>> their components with the same name.
>>>
>>> impacted method names are component#configure(), onConfigure(),
>>> initialize(), onInitialize().
>>>
>>> should we remove these features from 1.4.x to remove the chance of an
>>> incompatibility?
>>>
>>> -igor
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8
>

Reply via email to