Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > I've been trying out jrebel and wicket a couple of times, and I > thought it didn't work. It does, but the way Wicket development works > is undoing most of the benefits of using jrebel. >
My first question would be if there is any way to recreate the state of the page object? Does it have to persist between all requests? E.g. if I go to a different page and come back will it be the same object? And if that's the case is it possible to add something like ?reload to the end of the URL to recreate the instance when necessary? That would likely be an easier solution than using addOrReplace(). Jevgeni Kabanov -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/JRebel-and-wicket-tp3048578p3049236.html Sent from the Forum for Wicket Core developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
