I'm -1 on adding more subclasses to Wicket's type hierarchy. We have single inheritance in Java, why waste it for something which could equally well be implemented with behaviors?
Sven Am 30.11.2010 um 13:18 schrieb Andrea Del Bene: > Same for me. I prefer having new component classes with a meaningful name > rather then some more "checking type code" under the hood > > Just my 0.2 cents... >> personally i would prefer to have NumberField, UrlField, etc. based on >> some html5 detection (doctype or a setting) it can fallback to pre-5 >> html. >> >> >
