true fact! Martijn
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote: > i think core and sandbox are probably better names and more clearly > communicate the intent. > > -igor > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Martijn Dashorst > <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Currently our wicketstuff repo at github is one gigantic repo >> containing everything. I'd like to propose to split the repository >> into two: >> >> - github.com/wicketstuff/wicketstuff (containing just the core >> project) >> - github.com/wicketstuff/archive (containing all the >> side projects) >> >> The idea is that wicketstuff core is already a huge project, and I'd >> like to make the footprint contain just that, without the legacy >> projects that surround the core. >> >> I'd like to do this before folks start cloning away, so before we >> announce the availability. But if anyone wants to wait that's fine >> with me as well... >> >> Anyone got ideas or a different opinion? >> >> Martijn >> >> -- >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >> > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
