mike, do you want to craft an announcement to user@ and explain the new structure, etc. that way people will know we are good to go.
active committers can also start requesting push access. i have created a "committers" team in our github org for them. -igor On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Michael O'Cleirigh <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Igor, > > Yes, I think everything is good to go now > > Mike > >> so are we good to go now import-wise? >> >> -igor >> >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Michael O'Cleirigh >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I was able to add in a remote to the wicketstuff-core-1.4 branch from the >>> first import and then use git cherry-pick to pull in each of the 11 >>> commits >>> that had occurred since the 1.4.14 release tag was applied. >>> >>> I've pushed my changes into the wicketstuff/core repository. This should >>> build the 1.4.15-SNAPSHOT version. >>> >>> Once we have everything finalized and announced I will cut the 1.4.15 >>> release and update the core-1.4.x branch to track 1.4.16-SNAPSHOT >>> >>> Since about 1.4.10 I have been creating branches for each stable >>> wicketstuff-core release for the 1.4.stable.x point releases. Those >>> weren't >>> preserved as branches but I think the tags will be sufficient. >>> >>> I might try a new approach that follows how git is showing the historical >>> releases in that each release will get a tag and for the stable branch >>> that >>> tracks the non snapshot wicket release it would move forward from release >>> to >>> release. >>> >>> Actually the build just failed with push-timer complaining about java6 >>> ism's. >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> >>> >>>> i was able to restore it off the 1.4.14 release tag. hopefully there >>>> havent been commits in the interim. >>>> >>>> -igor >>>> >>>> 2010/12/29 Major Péter<[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> I think the wicketstuff-core-1.4 branch got lost, the core project now >>>>> only >>>>> has the 1.5-SNAPSHOT stuff, at least that branch should be restored >>>>> IMHO. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>>> 2010-12-29 22:50 keltezéssel, Igor Vaynberg írta: >>>>>> >>>>>> i think i got them split. core is already pushed, sandbox is incoming. >>>>>> >>>>>> we lost branches in the process, i dont think this is a big deal since >>>>>> they were mostly used as tags to mark releases. on the other hand i >>>>>> converted release branches to tags before i did the split, and those >>>>>> seemed to stick around - so maybe we havent lost anything at all. >>>>>> >>>>>> -igor >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Martijn Dashorst >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Great, I won't be of much help as I left my laptop at work due to a >>>>>>> mishap with my car (apparent broken battery) and needing to entertain >>>>>>> the AAA guy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Martijn >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 29, 2010, Igor >>>>>>> Vaynberg<[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> i will play around with splitting and we can see what happens >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -igor >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:04 AM, James Carman >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> On Dec 29, 2010 12:49 PM, "Igor Vaynberg"<[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> i think core and sandbox are probably better names and more >>>>>>>>>> clearly >>>>>>>>>> communicate the intent. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -igor >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Martijn Dashorst >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Currently our wicketstuff repo at github is one gigantic repo >>>>>>>>>>> containing everything. I'd like to propose to split the >>>>>>>>>>> repository >>>>>>>>>>> into two: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - github.com/wicketstuff/wicketstuff (containing just >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> core >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> project) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - github.com/wicketstuff/archive (containing all >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> side projects) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The idea is that wicketstuff core is already a huge project, and >>>>>>>>>>> I'd >>>>>>>>>>> like to make the footprint contain just that, without the legacy >>>>>>>>>>> projects that surround the core. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to do this before folks start cloning away, so before we >>>>>>>>>>> announce the availability. But if anyone wants to wait that's >>>>>>>>>>> fine >>>>>>>>>>> with me as well... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Anyone got ideas or a different opinion? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Martijn >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: >>>>>>>>>>> http://wicketinaction.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: >>>>>>> http://wicketinaction.com >>> > >
