Doesn't solve anything in particular, right? Personally, I think the current names are fine.
Eelco On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:02 PM, James Carman > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > >> ApplicationLifecycleListener? >> On Jan 18, 2011 8:14 AM, "Major Péter" <majorpe...@sch.bme.hu> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > since IInitializer now also works as an IDestroyer, wouldn't be >> > ApplicationContextListener a better name for it? (based on >> > ServletContextListener) >> > > Renaming classes will make the migration harder. > Unless it is really needed I prefer to keep it as it is. > > Or maybe we can introduce new interface - ApplicationLifetimeListener that > just extends IInitializer and make IInitializer deprecated, and remove it in > 1.6.0. > >> > >> > Regards, >> > Peter >> >
