[x] - Just forget about the aggregated wicket.jar and modify the wicket module a pom-only module
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Ryan McKinley [via Apache Wicket] < ml-node+3235299-873970764-65...@n4.nabble.com<ml-node%2b3235299-873970764-65...@n4.nabble.com> > wrote: > > > > [x] - Just forget about the aggregated wicket.jar and modify the wicket > > module a pom-only module. This means Maven users can eternally depend on > > > wicket only, and not care about how we (re-)structure our code. > Non-maven > > users will have to download all the separate jars, or use Ivy, or > whatever. > > > > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/discuss-How-to-resolve-wicket-aggregate-classes-sources-jar-issues-tp3234420p3235299.html > To start a new topic under Apache Wicket, email > ml-node+1842946-398011874-65...@n4.nabble.com<ml-node%2b1842946-398011874-65...@n4.nabble.com> > To unsubscribe from Apache Wicket, click > here<http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1842946&code=amNnYXJjaWFtQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwxODQyOTQ2fDEyNTYxMzc3ODY=>. > > -- Sincerely, JC (http://www.linkedin.com/in/jcgarciam) --Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.-- -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/discuss-How-to-resolve-wicket-aggregate-classes-sources-jar-issues-tp3234420p3235357.html Sent from the Forum for Wicket Core developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
