> I haven't looked at the exact implementation of
> WicketTester, but I think we should change the logic to pass assertInvisible
> if the component's isVisible method returns true, but some parent of the
> component (an enclosure, etc) is not visible, since in all reality, the
> component is then also invisible.
It is like that already:
public Result isVisible(String path)
{
Component component = getLastRenderedPage().get(path);
if (component == null)
{
fail("path: '" + path + "' does no exist for page: "
+
Classes.simpleName(getLastRenderedPage().getClass()));
}
return isTrue("component '" + path + "' is not visible",
component.isVisibleInHierarchy());
}
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://wickettraining.com
> *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
>
