Hi! 2011/2/21 Erik van Oosten <e.vanoos...@grons.nl>
> Hi Attila, > > Are you sure they are not used? They could be used transitively. > No, I am not sure that's why I am asking. I searched the poms, the java files and "mvn dependency:tree" reports but none of them contained the examples I mentioned before. > > Anyways, in order for core to be consistent, having versions in the modules > is not desirable if they are already in the core pom. > I agree with you but this is not the case. A lot of modules define the versions for their dependencies. > > Regards, > Erik. > > > > Op 20-02-11 20:23, Attila Király wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I noticed that there are a lot of dependencies in the dependencyManagement >> section of wicketstuff-core/pom.xml that are actually not used by the >> modules at all or the modules define the version for it (for >> example: commons-dbutils, lucene, spring-hibernate3). Are these >> definitions >> needed or could they be removed? >> >> Attila >> >> > -- > Sent from my SMTP compliant software > Erik van Oosten > http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ > > >
