Ah.. good point ;)
2011/5/8 Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>: > I talk about wicket:component, not about wicket:container. > > On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Martin Makundi > <[email protected]> wrote: >> What's the best replacement for it? Adding components where html dom >> does not allow? Renderbodyonly? >> >> ** >> Martin >> >> 2011/5/8 Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Recently I was updating the Wiki page for Wicket XML tags and >>> attributes and I added wicket:component tag section. >>> Now discussing the new .xsd with Attila I remembered some discussions >>> from ~ 2 years ago about this component resolver being with status >>> experimental and probably being dropped. >>> What is the current state of it? Will we support it or deprecate it ? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Martin Grigorov >>> jWeekend >>> Training, Consulting, Development >>> http://jWeekend.com >>> >> > > > > -- > Martin Grigorov > jWeekend > Training, Consulting, Development > http://jWeekend.com >
