The most important info is missing - the checkout url! :-) For devs: https://your_apache_usern...@git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket.git
For users: git://git.apache.org/wicket.git or https://github.com/apache/wicket On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Clint Checketts <checke...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Jeremy, >> >> Will Git development mimic the current subversion workflow, or will we see >> we see a more Git-ish way like 'git flow'? See- >> http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ > > > I think at least the core developers are already trying to adopt a more > git-like work flow. Look at some of the ajax/JS stuff that happened on GH > prior to being merged into SVN. I'm definitely in favor of a more > "Git-ish" way of doing things. > > >> I realize that likely the answer is 'we don't know yet', so I'd like to get >> the conversation going. >> > > I'd suggest: give us through the weekend for the committers to get git > (hehe pun) setup and in use, then let's start a separate discussion. I > also say this because of a very large thread on infrastructure-dev right > now [1] about the current git hook that requires all committers to have an @ > apache.org email address, which means for me to pull from your GH repo, for > instance, I'd need to rewrite the history some. I think that this > requirement will go away (the message I linked to is the first with real > weight that says it can go away), but whatever the outcome of that thread > is will have a major impact on our git-flow. Involvement with that ongoing > thread among other conversations has kept from from actually playing with > our git repo. I hope the distraction will be gone soon. > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/jsnmxdzf5qkkrvwg > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://wickettraining.com > *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org* -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com
