I forgot to add my +1. I still think my suggestion is a good one, though. On Apr 16, 2012 6:07 PM, "Igor Vaynberg" <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> why not just switch to osgi and run on a custom netty server? why > support servlet containers? :) this vote is for inclusion of the > wicket-cdi module as is... > > -igor > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:02 PM, James Carman > <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > > Perhaps have wicket piece itself together using cdi! This might help it > be > > more pluggable. It is much better these days but some things could be > > easier. > > On Apr 16, 2012 5:21 PM, "Martijn Dashorst" <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Perhaps we can join forces with the deltaspike folks in the incubator > >> and provide the required modules in their solution? Deltaspike is > >> seam's future according to the Seam team after all. > >> > >> Martijn > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com > > > >> wrote: > >> > we would like to merge wicket-cdi [1] into wicket-core. there is, > >> > however, a problem. in its current version CDI does not provide an SPI > >> > for controlling conversational scope, this will be part of the next > >> > major version of CDI. for now, wicket-cdi depends on > >> > seam-conversations JBOSS module which provides plugins for controlling > >> > conversational scope across various CDI implementations. the problem > >> > is that this module is not available in maven central, so we cannot > >> > publish wicket-cdi there as well. > >> > > >> > when and if JBOSS decides to push this module into central is unknown. > >> > > >> > here are our options > >> > > >> > 1. do not merge wicket-cdi until seam-conversations is available in > >> > central. may be never. currently wicket-cdi is available through a > >> > custom groupid in central, but it is not exactly kosher because of the > >> > same problem and can possibly be removed by maven folks in the future. > >> > > >> > 2. merge it into wicket and drop support for every CDI container other > >> > than JBOSS Weld, which is the reference impl and is probably the most > >> > widely used. > >> > > >> > 3. same as two, but rename the module to wicket-cdi-weld. when next > >> > CDI version comes out, or when seam-conversations becomes available in > >> > central we will rename the module back to wicket-cdi. > >> > > >> > -igor > >> > > >> > > >> > [1] https://github.com/42Lines/wicket-cdi > >> > [2] http://search.maven.org/#browse%7C-1741695030 > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > >> >
