you just said "but yeah, it is minor enough to wait.", no ? so do you want me to wait you to fix it, to try to fix it myself or to build 1.5.6 ?
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote: > so what was the point of asking the original question... > > -igor > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: >> you have your working day to fix it :-) >> otherwise either send me an email to not start the release or the fix >> will go in 1.5.7 >> >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> we thought it was invalid until after 1.5.5 was released...someone >>> just recently provided a good usecase for it. >>> >>> but yeah, it is minor enough to wait. >>> >>> -igor >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>> It is opened half an year ago. IMO It can wait for 1.5.7 but I don't >>>> mind postponing 1.5.6 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> WICKET-4286 needs to be fixed. havent had time lately :/ >>>>> >>>>> -igor >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I can build 1.5.6 tomorrow. >>>>>> Is there a ticket that you prefer to be fixed for 1.5.6 ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Martin >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Martin Grigorov >>>> jWeekend >>>> Training, Consulting, Development >>>> http://jWeekend.com >> >> >> >> -- >> Martin Grigorov >> jWeekend >> Training, Consulting, Development >> http://jWeekend.com -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com
