Welcome!

Good to know that you enjoy Wicket so much. I'm happy to have another
satisfied customer :).

If you have good suggestions, please share! Anything that makes Wicket
better is welcome.

Martijn


On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Garret Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, everybody. I'd like to take a moment to introduce myself, as I am
> interested in contributing to the Wicket codebase.
>
> Around 2005 I became dissatisfied with the (then new) JavaServer Faces (JSF)
> framework promoted by Sun. I liked their idea of having a component
> hierarchy on the back-end, but I didn't think they took that concept far
> enough. I had an extremely deep background in Swing, so I decided to create
> my own web application framework from the ground up, naming it "Guise". I
> used the Guise Framework <http://www.guiseframework.com/doc/intro/> for a
> single commercial project for a client, but for the past few years I've been
> doing more desktop work with Swing again and haven't had time to take it any
> further, although it continues to run all my personal sites including the
> link above.
>
> In 2010 I started working for another client, who was primarily using Wicket
> on their site. I had never heard of Wicket before, but as I went through the
> code I had a sense of deja vu, as so much of the architecture is similar
> between Guise and Wicket, and I saw many similar implementation dilemmas
> each framework had to address. Both Guise and Wicket start with the concept
> of an application framework with a server-side hierarchy of components, with
> all event processing handled on the client. There are a few differences,
> though:
>
> * Wicket requires the developer to create an HTML skeleton upon which
> components are injected. Guise automatically generates 100% of the HTML at
> runtime from the server components (with pluggable renderers, similar to
> Swing). Developers write no HTML or JavaScript; for all they know, they
> could be writing in a variant of Swing with generics.
> * Wicket allows some Ajax capability, but in Guise Ajax functionality is
> baked in. Everything works off Ajax. As we didn't have things like JQuery
> and such back in 2005, I had to write all the XMLHttpRequest processing
> myself. (And please don't even mention the nightmare that was IE6!)
> * Wicket encourages subclassing to handle events. Guise instead uses a
> system of even listeners (again similar to Swing).
>
> I've been very impressed with the architecture of Wicket. In particular its
> system of models is very elegant, allowing detaching and reloading. Its
> handling of persistence between HTTP requests and multiple open tabs is far
> ahead of Guise, which keeps a single entire component tree in memory and
> assumes there is only one "view" at one time per session.
>
> There are so many ways I'd like to improve Guise based upon my experience
> over the years, but I don't have the free time. And I can't recommend Guise
> to my clients, because there exists no community to support it. However it
> turns out that my current client has just started using Wicket. I'll like to
> contribute back some code to Wicket to make it even better, and perhaps some
> of my experience from my Guise project can be beneficial. Maybe someday I'll
> get to use my Wicket experience to go back and make Guise everything I
> wanted it to be. Or maybe Guise could be a module of Wicket---who knows.
>
> For now I'd like to offer some feedback and make some suggestions based upon
> our needs on my current project, and once the current Wicket team feels
> comfortable with my competence perhaps I can make some code contributions as
> well. In particular I note that one of Wicket's main goals is to eliminate
> boilerplate, but some of the same shortcomings I saw four years ago seem to
> still be around, requiring a bit more boilerplate (and scouring the web for
> examples) than may be necessary. I'll offer some proposals in separate
> emails.
>
> I look forward to working everyone and making Wicket even better and easier
> to use.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Garret Wilson



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com

Reply via email to