On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote: > Additionally the builder pattern makes it a bit harder to extend a class.
True, but StringResourceModel is not particularly intended for extension... Anyways, I'd have StringResourceModel as is, and provide I18N as a utility for application builders. I'd like to see more practical builders in Wicket to improve legibility of application code–but only where it makes sense. **Choice classes are a drag with all the constructors, but are intended for extension so applying a builder in that case would not make life for application developers much easier. Martijn
