Patches and/or Pull Requests are always welcome!

Wicket-Bootstrap uses webjars and OSGi users haven't complaint so far.
On Dec 10, 2014 5:41 PM, "Daniel Stoch" <[email protected]> wrote:

> If we want to allow the applications to use their own version of
> jquery.atmosphere.js why not to use the similar solution to
> IJavaScriptLibrarySettings? In my opinion a framework (Wicket) should
> not depends on library (wicket-webjars) which depends on that
> framework. I know that wicket-atmoshpere is still an experimental
> project, but maybe in a near future it will be a part of core - and
> then such dependency will be problematic.
>
> Beside of this I am using OSGi environment for our applications and I
> don't know are these dependencies (wicket-webjars, jquery-atmosphere
> webjar) distributed as OSGi bundles?
> So "All you have to do is to edit your pom.xml." is not enough :(
>
> --
> Daniel
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The .js file is inside jquery.atmosphere.jar file. It is loaded as any
> > other package resource in Wicket.
> > Wicket Webjars is just a helper that knows how to find the JS file in a
> > webjar (see http://webjars.org).
> >
> > The benefit of using webjars is that now the application can use any
> > version of Atmosphere, not just the one Wicket-Atmosphere has been
> released
> > with. All you have to do is to edit your pom.xml.
> > On Dec 10, 2014 5:26 PM, "Daniel Stoch" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to upgrade Wicket to 6.18 and Atmosphere integration to
> >> 0.21. Unfortunately in WICKET-5674 a new dependency was added
> >> (de.agilecoders.wicket.webjars). Do we really need this dependency,
> >> maybe it can be optional. I don't want to add another external project
> >> to my app and I don't know how this works.
> >>
> >> Where is a jquery.atmosphere.js in wicket-atmosphere module (it was
> >> there up to Wicket 6.16)? Is it downloaded at runtime from the web?
> >> What if my users does not have an internet connection (eg. from
> >> security reasons)?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel
> >>
>

Reply via email to