Martijn, quick quiz: do you know/remember what IClusterable was created for ? :-)
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Martijn Dashorst < [email protected]> wrote: > Ok, > > But shouldn't IPageProvider rather extend IClusterable? One can > provide a custom IPageProvider implementation without having it be > serializable. > > Martijn > > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Tobias Soloschenko > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > here is the ticket in which we discussed it. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5828 > > > > kind regards > > > > Tobias > > > >> Am 22.02.2015 um 17:31 schrieb Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>: > >> > >> This has been fixed recently in master. Right after you've cut M5 > >> On Feb 22, 2015 6:29 PM, "Martijn Dashorst" <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> While fixing a compilation error due to the removal of IPageLink, I > >>> encountered that InlineFrame now uses IPageProvider and stores it in > >>> an instance field. > >>> > >>> Unfortunately, IPageProvider has no requirement to be Serializable and > >>> the default implementation PageProvider is not serializable. This will > >>> lead to serialization errors. > >>> > >>> What shall we do? I don't think that PageProvider was ever intended as > >>> a serializable concept so this can go a lot of ways... > >>> > >>> Martijn > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > >>> > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >
