+1 for 3.1 On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
> +1 b) > > Sven > > > On 06.10.2015 08:03, Emond Papegaaij wrote: > >> +1 for 3.1 >> >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Tobias Soloschenko >> <tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think servlet 3.1 and JEE 7 should be used in the next version. Wicket >>> 7 >>> is targeting JEE 6 so it is covered. >>> >>> kind regards >>> >>> Tobias >>> >>> Am 05.10.15 um 22:17 schrieb Martijn Dashorst: >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Now even with Martijn's commit (remove Servlet 3.1 methods) the build >>>>> still >>>>> fails because Jetty 9.3 (and even 9.2.x) requires 3.1.0. >>>>> >>>>> Any preferences what to do? >>>>> a) use Jetty 8.x >>>>> b) use Servlet 3.1.0 >>>>> >>>>> I personally am for b). By the time we reach to 8.0.0 this should be >>>>> fine >>>>> for most apps out there :-) >>>>> >>>> We gain support for jetty 9, but drop support for any JavaEE 6 >>>> deployable. >>>> >>>> Servlet 3.1 is JavaEE 7. >>>> >>>> Apps that require servlet 3.0 and JavaEE 6 will still have Wicket 6.x >>>> and 7.x to build against for the foreseeable future, so I don't think >>>> it would be very hard to drop servlet 3.0 and Java EE 6. >>>> >>>> My guess is most supported contracts for Java EE 6 containers don't >>>> have a provision for Java 8, so they can't upgrade anyhow. >>>> >>>> Before I cast my vote, I'd like to wait for more opinions... >>>> >>>> Martijn >>>> >>> >>> > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
