But this is not good and I think a Bug of this Model. It should behave the same.
kind regards Tobias > Am 06.12.2015 um 11:46 schrieb Sven Meier <[email protected]>: > > Hi Tobias, > > I'm not sure: CompoundPropertyModel#bind() has a generic type parameter, > perhaps this is treated differently in Java 7 vs. 8. > > Sven > >> On 06.12.2015 10:57, Tobias Soloschenko wrote: >> Hi Sven, >> >> so the behavior of wicket-7.x is right then? Because getObect receives the >> actual nested model and not src as model object? >> >> Then we have an error in master. >> >> kind regards >> >> Tobias >> >>> Am 06.12.2015 um 10:04 schrieb Sven Meier <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Hi Tobios, >>> >>>> new ExternalImage("compoundImage",compoundPropertyModel.bind("url"))); >>> >>> this invokes the constructor with the Serializable argument, effectively >>> wrapping the propertyModel inside a normal model. >>> >>> Have fun >>> Sven >>> >>> >>>> On 06.12.2015 09:31, Tobias Soloschenko wrote: >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> Martin mentioned to me that my last integration breaks the build of >>>> Wicket-7.x. >>>> >>>> As I saw master compiled fine. After a short research we found out that >>>> the CompoundPropertyModel works slightly different. >>>> >>>> Output in wicket-7.x: >>>> >>>> <img wicket:id="compoundImage" >>>> src="Model:classname=[org.apache.wicket.model.PropertyModel]:nestedModel=[Model:classname=[org.apache.wicket.model.CompoundPropertyModel]:nestedModel=[org.apache.wicket.markup.html.image.ExternalImageTestPage$ImageSrc@7cdbc5d3]]:expression=[url]"/> >>>> >>>> Output in master: >>>> >>>> <img wicket:id="compoundImage" src="http://www.google.de/test.jpg"/> >>>> >>>> Invokation: >>>> >>>> ImageSrc imageSrc = new ImageSrc(); >>>> imageSrc.setUrl("http://www.google.de/test.jpg"); >>>> CompoundPropertyModel<ImageSrc> compoundPropertyModel = new >>>> CompoundPropertyModel<ImageSrc>(imageSrc); >>>> add(new >>>> ExternalImage("compoundImage",compoundPropertyModel.bind("url"))); >>>> >>>> Code to receive the model object. String.valueOf(model.getObject()); >>>> >>>> I don't know what changed, but maybe you know. >>>> >>>> kind regards >>>> >>>> Tobias >>>>
