+1 to release!

Tested:
- our main application
- Wicket Bootstrap
- WicketStuff
- Apache Isis (branch ISIS-1223-upgrade-to-wicket-7)

Arquillian builds fine both here and at BuildBot.
The problem with the ranges is not critical, IMO. It is like this since
this code has been introduced and works in all browsers but Safari. There
is no complain by real user for it yet.

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Ubuntu 15.10, oracle JFK 7 latest, maven latest
> Will try one more time tomorrow
>
> WBR, Maxim
> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
> On Dec 25, 2015 16:36, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > which is your environment? I have no problem with compilation using
> > OpenJDK 7 and Maven 3.3.3.
> >
> > On 24/12/15 16:22, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >
> >> got following error while trying to compile:
> >>
> >> <skipped>
> >> Caused by: java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Managed server was not
> >> started within [60] s
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.jboss.as.arquillian.container.managed.ManagedDeployableContainer.startInternal(ManagedDeployableContainer.java:204)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.jboss.as.arquillian.container.CommonDeployableContainer.start(CommonDeployableContainer.java:112)
> >> <skipped>
> >>
> >> Tests in error:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> InsertContactTest.org.apache.wicket.arquillian.testing.pages.InsertContactTest
> >> » Lifecycle
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ArquillianContainerProvidedTest.org.apache.wicket.arquillian.testing.servletcontext.ArquillianContainerProvidedTest
> >> » Runtime
> >>
> >> [INFO] Wicket JavaScript Tests ............................ SUCCESS [
> >>   0.352 s]
> >> [INFO] Wicket Arquillian Testing .......................... FAILURE
> [01:25
> >> min]
> >> [INFO] Wicket User Guide .................................. SKIPPED
> >> [INFO]
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >> [INFO]
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >> should I ignore it?
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to