Examples should be ok now. I will close the PR on github.

Andrea.

ok, I'll take a look today

On 5 Jan 2016 12:27, "Martin Grigorov" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    This sounds as a regression caused by 950df6c24196680a48646ff92b3d95
    9f4985a238

    @Andrea: could you please investigate and either improve further
    or revert
    the change? Thanks!

    Martin Grigorov
    Wicket Training and Consulting
    https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

    On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Francois Meillet <
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    > if the CachingStrategy is FilenameWithVersionResourceCachingStrategy
    > (default)
    >
    > BasicResourceReferenceMapper # mapHandler
    >         --> getCachingStrategy().decorateUrl(resourceUrl,
    cacheable);
    >                 --> FilenameWithVersionResourceCachingStrategy #
    > decorateUrl()
    >                         --> CachingResourceVersion # getVersion()
    >                                 --> resource.getCacheKey()
    >                                         --> ConcatBundleResource #
    > getCacheKey()
    >                                                 -->
    PackageResource #
    > getCacheKey() has been modified in the commit
    > 950df6c24196680a48646ff92b3d959f4985a238 "Improved
    > PackageResource#getCacheKey" done on the 3/1/2016
    >  -->
    > PackageResource # exists()
    >
    > String absolutePath = Packages.absolutePath(scope, path) is wrong
    >
    > for the footer.css the absolutePath is
    >
    >
    
org/apache/wicket/examples/resourcedecoration/org/apache/wicket/examples/resourcedecoration/footer.css
    >                                                 --> then
    > ConcatBundleResource # getCacheKey() return null
    >  -->
    > ConcatBundleResource # reportError is called
    >
    > With the NoOpResourceCachingStrategy, decorateUrl does nothing,
    so there
    > is no problem.
    >
    > Francois
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Le 5 janv. 2016 à 09:58, martin-g <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
    >
    > > Github user martin-g commented on the pull request:
    > >
    > > https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/154#issuecomment-168938119
    > >
    > >    It is interesting to find how this got broken.
    > >    Do you have time to `git bisect` it ?
    > >    I'll be able to do it as soon as next week.
    > >
    > >
    > > ---
    > > If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
    and have
    > your
    > > reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
    > feature
    > > enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not
    working,
    > please
    > > contact infrastructure at [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]> or file a JIRA
    > ticket
    > > with INFRA.
    > > ---
    >
    >


Reply via email to