Hi Sven, thanks for the effort! There is another topic which is wrong - Wicket also supports Portlets. There was a fix @ Wicketstuff to make the portlet bridge running on WPS 8.5 / Liferay.
If you count wicket-bootstrap as Wicket you also can say that there are default themes. A lot of components are in wicketstuff mentioned not being included in Wicket in that matrix. A lot of checks - the browsers at the end of this matrix can be considered to be supported.... Oohhhhh dear.... kind regards Tobias > Am 06.04.2016 um 12:07 schrieb Sven Meier <[email protected]>: > > Hi all, > > Alejandro Duarte was so kind and updated the matrix with some facts based on > my comments. > Some star ratings ('web technology abstractions', '#widgets') are still way > off, but alas, these are opinions. > > Have fun > Sven > > >> On 05.04.2016 21:11, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> not to mention the missing mark in the "Built for dynamic web pages" >> row....to me this comparison is just (bad) marketing. >>> Hi, >>> >>> I do not like such comparisons. >>> >>> Beside that: >>> >>> Wicket has Websocket Support >>> Wicket has Spring Integration >>> >>> kind regards >>> >>> Tobias >>> >>>> Am 05.04.2016 um 18:33 schrieb Francois Meillet >>>> <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Have you seen the https://vaadin.com/comparison ? >>>> >>>> >>>> François >
