Just tested - everything seems fine!
Thank you!

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>
wrote:

> ok, should be ok now. I've update the readme.md to the new required
> version. Let me now if you see something wrong.
>
>
>
> On 05/08/2016 20:46, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>
>> +1 to upgrade
>>
>> kind regards
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>> Am 05.08.2016 um 19:41 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> https://jekyllrb.com/docs/upgrading/2-to-3/ :
>>>
>>> "If you organized your categories as |/_posts/code/2008-12-24-closu
>>> res.md|, you will need to restructure your directories to put the
>>> categories /above/ the |_posts| directories, as follows: |/code/_posts/
>>> 2008-12-24-closures.md|."
>>>
>>> If we restructure news this way it works (tested). But then it won't
>>> work with  Jekyll < 3. Shall we upgrade to ver. 3?
>>>
>>> On 05/08/2016 16:33, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>>>> Why ?
>>>> The .md is fine. Some with good Jekyll could just regenerate it.
>>>>
>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest to revert the commit.
>>>>>
>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 05.08.2016 um 16:19 schrieb Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems my new Jekyll (v.3.1.6) broke somehow the generation of the
>>>>>> news
>>>>>> at http://wicket.apache.org :-/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could someone else try to regenerate the htmls and push them ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P.S. Jekyll hates me. Everytime I try to build the site I have to fix
>>>>>> Jekyll by finding working versions of its dependencies. I don't have
>>>>>> experience with Ruby but it seems like a nigthmare to keep an
>>>>>> application
>>>>>> in a workable state with it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>

Reply via email to