Hi Andrea,
is the release version also staged with 4-SNAPSHOT? I think this can't
be, because maven does not allow to release versions with -SNAPSHOT. So
is the staged version released with version 4?
kind regards
Tobias
Am 27.12.16 um 14:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
Master branch has 4-SNAPSHOT as version. Staging repository
(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1081/)
does not contain wicket-eclipse-settings module.
On 27/12/2016 12:10, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
Hi Andrea,
no I just saw that in master the version was 4-SNAPSHOT. There are no
requirements to release new versions each time. 1 was for 6.x, 2 was
for 7.x and 3 was for master (8.x) branch. If version 4 is in the
release now this is nothing bad, but it is not required to be
released each time with wicket.
Can you have a look at the released master version? If there is a 4
we also need to release wicket-eclipse-settings 4 - otherwise there
will be issues for all who downloaded the eclipse-settings module
from the marketplace - there will be an eclipse error saying that
version 4 is not available.
kind regards
Tobias
Am 27.12.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>:
I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something
specific to do for the release?
On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
Hi Andrea,
did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3?
kind regards
Tobias
Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene
<an.delb...@gmail.com>:
ok, I've manually closed it.
On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
@Martijn
I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create
it but it's not exposed
(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080).
Any clue?
On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Thanks a lot Andrea!
WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <an.delb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i
will try
later this evening .
On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <an.delb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long
one :-)
On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Hello,
Any news on topic?
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
One short note:
eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are
only 1,2,3 -
3
is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
kind regards
Tobias
Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene
<an.delb...@gmail.com>:
Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to
make a
release
so it might take some time :)
On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were
some things
with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those
are not
insurmountable.
Martijn
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov
<mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi Tobias,
According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any
project that
already
uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6
months from the
announcement).
I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only
if we have
few
weeks to test before making a release.
I just want to avoid something like: you merge the
branches today and
few
days later Martijn cuts the release.
@Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release
scripts?
Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to
make it
possible to
run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person
can make a
release.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi
should the release already exclude json.org or not - that
would be
my
question.
kind regards
Tobias
Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene
<an.delb...@gmail.com
:
I might find some time before the new year but I am not
100% sure
yet.
Andrea.
On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
We could use org.json without legal issues until April
2017.
Good to know :)
So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
mgrigo...@apache.org>
wrote:
Hi,
My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be
merged to the
"production" branches only if we have some time to
test in those
branches.
I prefer to merge them right after the release of
6.26/7.6 so we
have
time
to find any issues.
I don't want this change to be merged and two days
later to make
a
release.
We could use org.json without legal issues until April
2017.
My 2c.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
solomax...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello Sven,
Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
It was sort of scheduled [1]
I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3]
changes :)))
I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases
would be great
Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
WDYT?
[1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier
<s...@meiers.net>
wrote:
Hi Maxim,
your on the right list :P
There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
Have fun
Sven
On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
estimates? :)
WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
solomax...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello All,
Do you have any estimates for the subject?
Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
