Hi Martin, Wicket-4201 IPageProvider improvement: will work on the ticket during the week
Expression language change [1]: it's a big change and I think it needs the team approval Wicket-4008 expression language parser: the parser is functional and there isn't much work pending on it. I can finish and merge the work during the week. 1 - http://wicket-dev.markmail.org/thread/unwdqpxulw7tcd5l Pedro Santos On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > @Sven: have you started migrating your app ? > > @Pedro: any idea when you will have time to finish your improvements? Do > you need any help ? > > > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Probably we should stick to the principle: If it works, don't touch it! >> This is related to CGLib and ClassMetaCache >> >> Martin Grigorov >> Wicket Training and Consulting >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Pedro Santos <pedros...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> We can replace ClassMetaCache used in wicket-ioc's Injector by a Jandex[1] >>> class index. >>> >>> 1 - https://github.com/wildfly/jandex >>> >>> Pedro Santos >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > The main advantages of ByteBuddy are: >>> > - actively developed >>> > - Mockito 2 moved to it >>> > - Hibernate 5.x is moving to it ( >>> > https://twitter.com/vlad_mihalcea/status/798971296910483456) >>> > - Spring considers it (they actually already use it for the tests: >>> > https://twitter.com/ankinson/status/799363435775586308) >>> > - support for Java 9 (we will need it at some point) >>> > - support for Android (I guess no one will ever run Wicket inside >>> Android, >>> > but who knows) >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Martin Grigorov >>> > Wicket Training and Consulting >>> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>> > >>> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Replace CGLIB with ByteBuddy because it has better support for Java 8 >>> > and 9 >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > What are the advantages? Seems Spring hasn't decided on this yet: >>> > > >>> > > https://jira.spring.io/browse/SPR-8190 >>> > > >>> > > Regards >>> > > Sven >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On 20.11.2016 00:47, Martin Grigorov wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> Replace CGLIB with ByteBuddy because it has better support for Java 8 >>> > and >>> > >> 9 >>> > >> ? >>> > >> CGLIB could stay as fallback (via system property) until 9.0.0. >>> > >> >>> > >> Martin Grigorov >>> > >> Wicket Training and Consulting >>> > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>> > >> >>> > >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Andrea Del Bene < >>> an.delb...@gmail.com >>> > > >>> > >> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> yah, I think it's better >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On 14/11/2016 19:54, Martin Grigorov wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> +1 >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Maybe rename #forResource() to #of() ? >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Martin Grigorov >>> > >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>> > >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Andrea Del Bene < >>> > an.delb...@gmail.com> >>> > >>>> wrote: >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> I'm wondering if there is room for an improvement for >>> > ResourceReference, >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>>> introducing lambda support also for this component. Actually it's >>> > >>>>> something >>> > >>>>> that can be done after the release of 8.0.0, but I'd like to >>> collect >>> > >>>>> your >>> > >>>>> feedback anyway. The idea is to provide factory methods to build a >>> > >>>>> ResourceReference using lambdas and avoiding anonymous classes to >>> > >>>>> implement >>> > >>>>> getResource(). >>> > >>>>> The following snippet should better explain what I mean: >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> https://gist.github.com/bitstorm/03cfe9905a3f86a7160ab49f0ce23f13 >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> Andrea. >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> On 31/10/2016 14:41, Martin Grigorov wrote: >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> Hi, >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>>> What other improvements do we need in 8.x/master before >>> promoting it >>> > >>>>>> to >>> > >>>>>> 8.0.0 final ? >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> At https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Ideas+ >>> > >>>>>> for+Wicket+8.0 >>> > >>>>>> we still have: >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> - new DateTime APIs for wicket-datetime *WICKET-6105 >>> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6105>* - I'll give >>> > this >>> > >>>>>> one >>> > >>>>>> more try but the problem is that I don't believe this is the >>> proper >>> > >>>>>> way >>> > >>>>>> and >>> > >>>>>> this demotivates me. >>> > >>>>>> If someone else wants to give it a try - please assign it to >>> > yourself! >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> - Better SEO for stateful pages - the only way I see this is by >>> > using >>> > >>>>>> ServiceWorker to add the pageId as a request header to all >>> requests >>> > >>>>>> (normal >>> > >>>>>> & Ajax) >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> Recently I wondered whether Redux.js could be in use for Wicket. >>> > >>>>>> I don't have much experience with it, but both React and >>> AngularJs >>> > >>>>>> communities use it to manage the state for their components. >>> > >>>>>> There are some Java impls, even a standard is coming: >>> > >>>>>> https://github.com/jvm-redux/jvm-redux-api >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> What else ? >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>> > >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>> > >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >>
