On 25/09/2017 11:58, Sebastien wrote:
Maybe a -M8 in the meantime?
I agree but the next milestone in my opinion should contain WICKET-6105.
I would discourage to release WICKET-6105 directly into 8.0.0 without
testing it in a milestone version. If this fix can be solved in the very
next days I prefer waiting for it.
As well as 6.29 so releases cycle stay aligned? (btw, does the page store
issue not applies to wicket-6.x?)
Not sure about the page store issue, but I also agree that a 6.29.0
should be released.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>
wrote:
No AFAIK but I'd rather wait for WICKET-6105 to be solved. It's a delicate
issue and I would like to collect as many user feedback as possible before
publishing the final 8.0.0
