Thank you Sven. I confirm my positive vote.

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> there's no need to make a fuss about this feature.
>
> When Korbinian and I started working on deferred JavaScript, I was under
> the impression:
>
> a) that the JavaScript part is sorted out already
> b) every framework supports it (to be kind of cool)
> b) we have to rework major parts to bake this into Wicket
>
> Now I understand that
>
> x) deferred loading of JavaSript is fucked up in browsers
> y) other frameworks are struggling with this too
> z) only a tiny change was required in Wicket to allow people to experiment
> with deferred JavaScript
>
> We *need* a note in the release notes for z), as the handling of
> IHeaderResponseDecorator has slightly. I don't consider this a big deal,
> because users will have to change a *single* place only *if* they use
> JavaScriptFilteredIntoFooterHeaderResponse at all.
> Compare that with introducing Optional for the return of
> RequestTarget#find(): that might *silently* break applications and requires
> to rework possibly *hundreds* of code places.
>
> Furthermore WICKET- 6498 added a single class
> JavaScriptDeferHeaderResponse only - yes, it's experimental but with no API
> surface to break in the future. Nobody has to use it so I don't see the
> need to praise/warn about it in the release notes.
> I don't consider it broken, browsers are broken. However I have no problem
> to remove that class: we can just put it into confluence or wicketstuff.
>
> Once again: It is a *single* class with *no* API - that's nothing compared
> to component queueing :P
>
> Have fun
> Sven
>
>
>
>
> Am 16.02.2018 um 13:32 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
>
>> On Feb 16, 2018 10:50 AM, "Martin Grigorov" <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> That's what I'd write in the release note:
>>>
>>> Caveats
>>> ------------------
>>> WICKET-6498 might not work as expected due to a known issues with all
>>>
>> major
>>
>>> browsers (Chrome, Firefox, IE > 10) which allows deferred scripts to be
>>> executed before DOMContentLoaded is fired. For this reason WICKET-6498
>>> should be avoided for production applications and used carefully.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Why do we ship it if it is known to be broken ?
>> AFAIR we don't have such precedent before.
>>
>>
>> Have you forgotten about components queueing :-D :-D?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Korbinian Bachl <
>>> korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> in short: since IE 11 and chrome as well as FF the browsers dont fire
>>>>
>>> the
>>
>>> DOMContentLoaded of scripts the way one would expect. This happens as
>>>>
>>> the
>>
>>> browsers branch multiple threads that each thread put together execution
>>>> groups of orders leading to inline-JS getting executed and events on
>>>>
>>> these
>>>
>>>> fired without the knowledge of other JS resources as long as these are
>>>> defered and / or / asnyc'd
>>>>
>>>> Even worse, an app that may work well in local mode may break in
>>>> production as network timing as well as client CPU count (influences
>>>> thread) and speed of CPU and or GPU (yep... ) may change the timings the
>>>> event DOMContentLoaded  gets fired;
>>>>
>>>> even JQuery guys are plagued by this and have no real solution to it now
>>>> IMHO https://github.com/jquery/jquery/issues/3271
>>>>
>>>> I think we can get a real working one for wicket but had no time yet to
>>>> try it out; Idea is to create the wicket object in the head at first
>>>>
>>> inline
>>>
>>>> script before any JS resources (defered or not) so that the page itself
>>>> cant break because of this
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>
>>>>> Von: "Andrea Del Bene" <an.delb...@gmail.com>
>>>>> An: dev@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Februar 2018 16:48:18
>>>>> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I need your help. what's exactly the caveat about  WICKET-6498? It
>>>>>
>>>> uses
>>
>>> javascript events that might not be supported buy browser?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Korbinian Bachl <
>>>>> korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 to release for M9
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IMHO a warning should be added with regards to WICKET-6498 as it is
>>>>>>
>>>>> not
>>>
>>>> yet working in a reliable way but may break depending on client
>>>>>>
>>>>> specifics;
>>>>
>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Von: "Andrea Del Bene" <an.delb...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> An: dev@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. Februar 2018 17:34:08
>>>>>>> Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9
>>>>>>> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
>>>>>>> linked below.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> vote
>>>
>>>> lasts for 72 hours minimum.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] Yes, release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9
>>>>>>> [ ] No, don't release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9, because ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Distributions, changelog, keys and signatures can be found at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/wicket/8.0.0-M9
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> orgapachewicket-1105/
>>>>
>>>>> The binaries are available in the above link, as are a staging
>>>>>>> repository for Maven. Typically the vote is on the source, but
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> should
>>>
>>>> you find a problem with one of the binaries, please let me know, I
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> can
>>>
>>>> re-roll them some way or the other.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Staging git repository data:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      Repository:  g...@github.com:bitstorm/wicket.git
>>>>>>>      Branch:      build/wicket-8.0.0-M9
>>>>>>>      Release tag: rel/wicket-8.0.0-M9
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ============
>>>>
>>>>>      The signatures for the source release artefacts:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signature for apache-wicket-8.0.0-M9.zip:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> iQIcBAABAgAGBQJagFiiAAoJEIePAfqo01bhPxsP/jgrMjf/3IVHWSOftoHEYf+j
>>>>>>> Wtb8gvB0Y3sY8L6syj5GQCuhceaovbq3NCnAz0qrn/tLRuUnybyj8GfyMrQv4wNP
>>>>>>> rDj7zPRqhsldgbSTsjDP98b0V99F5ct68HsxOr3LzxNijFNFRxIDnF+73QZNjUcA
>>>>>>> YL4xuxP80WvMb1mmwASg+l9MxhEWpeYWoyOBHNWFmjgI/4r3ineq2YSjAq3MZKOC
>>>>>>> Vu4CqYS+ajEFMqduHU4aa9j4Lj4X81by34c9xCKERaioI7kFhoZzhws6ufoA/wNo
>>>>>>> EPBPBft9oG72rUfX9VwyZxHMBmU50eKmEtFeCtWXqu5v8Js2rVTxmw4EGKENj3+8
>>>>>>> Kiup7+zXu9t07mvoS4mCJ8fcl7P+g24e02pdqHDBea/a7zAKUdrIe6MCMJ2Qlw0g
>>>>>>> E/xlDJ4utPcU7E88IQiCLpmarN3uBZKnivzm3Uir5U0dJtffu4IacABg5Svp3DAl
>>>>>>> TcUOmM9QxKYjD8Ey6uORoGTm3gZmx4FcnNjSw0ch27fyNUpYVfEyU88KH9vz2dQP
>>>>>>> Tcs9LxRpII4pBGXu0nK5zWZfXBgqxYfUUrIroCrzVWub+wqEw8pXo2K9GdrUYpcg
>>>>>>> K12TIpW3X43zNG7L6lTJtFe2yffVLdyS1DDoqU3QI4gHe/vdIC3atd4BP0Aeauj1
>>>>>>> jIvOQJKU+bwlubLLneTg
>>>>>>> =MOtP
>>>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signature for apache-wicket-8.0.0-M9.tar.gz:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> iQIcBAABAgAGBQJagFihAAoJEIePAfqo01bheU8QAIkUJK3zjjVeARkAbN3Zi1hE
>>>>>>> b5qnaSiXkuxZyTfVzDS4Ui7OZwIOY1RJ1YlJ4fZwio+BJhpxnCiPjPLRC1VNwA4q
>>>>>>> oMBsOfwePU92kJYQERfVfJgNkk1ixyh52k3qsoS4EIdKT+bOW52hT8zaXRNazhG3
>>>>>>> nwyDTe00c/ibj5KM68L7R4LXef6tbnZAjegKBDNUsvWQltwE2xc1lVapnNoqtOAM
>>>>>>> B26gWh5G8QDQxjWJESk9ik+Vyyg9We8lABV5+Hkqrugv3yECiD9ObcYE29bE/OHN
>>>>>>> hfgzo5EX+umXzTkoHltQ0ZxAxPiWWquH3tjsy1/z/8r3BT4YBZs+PIoOCSPem6kK
>>>>>>> aUoJiBEZ55WsBVd5NdYY7PiSwZ2KWsuE1XmqADY+USuhytPln04YNK9srdVESnCL
>>>>>>> sBxGP0kgHKrD92O1aTLpzan3VhD1O8KzjH/8MMEWJxevQbW/gorlAjh7+iCVcH7g
>>>>>>> YurqMjtq91YFFlZwU5YlczfhnZmR4/Efp3/O57S76HOyaMWYloj0vs2OQH3TJTm7
>>>>>>> GLvO/b9R46mgnnlHVhxN2z1f0xTOFwpeXIjchb+jHs0SuxOVAqrIpGmsFG8Siv/V
>>>>>>> 3spQEzAzM/Enl2PgaCNlU0aus/i35FRLEmlCf7nyuwVQCbsE3d5W/fKLYeJOD9Wq
>>>>>>> CCJOHO3iofZ0wlGnB5J7
>>>>>>> =/qPh
>>>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ============
>>>>
>>>>>      CHANGELOG for 8.0.0-M9:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ** Bug
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6332] - NullPointerException in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> PageParameters#equals()
>>>
>>>>      * [WICKET-6441] - MockHttpSession and MockSessionStore don't
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> call
>>>
>>>> onInvalidate() on invalidate()
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6448] - Provide behavior that disables a button after
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> click
>>>>
>>>>>      * [WICKET-6477] - Component.getDefaultModelObject() wraps in
>>>>>>> RuntimeException instead of WicketRuntimeException
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6484] - Wicket.Cookie.set does not set 'secure' flag
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6489] - Exception when "identifier|code" javascript
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> is
>>
>>> not start on PrependJavaScript
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6491] - AjaxDownload is not working in blob mode for
>>>>>>> Microsoft browsers
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6492] - javascript files are not minified in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> deployment
>>>
>>>> mode and not united
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6493] - WebSocket SessionIds are wrong (HttpSession
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> one
>>>
>>>> used instead of Websocket one) + NPE if no HttpSession is found
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> during
>>>
>>>> Handshake Request
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6496] - Duplicate definition of interface JSONString
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6501] - DefaultPageManagerProvider does not honour
>>>>>>> StoreSettings.setAsynchronous(false)
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6506] - Performance issue when large component isn't
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> visible
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6512] - pageId is being reset during
>>>>>>> Session::replaceSession() call
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6513] - NullPointerException at
>>>>>>> PageStoreManager$SessionEntry after login
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6518] - Memory leaks on quickstart restart in tomcat
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6522] - ThreadLocal leak in PageStoreManager
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6523] - Two AbstractAjaxTimerBehaviors on same
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> component
>>>
>>>> timeId conflict
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6524] - Do not require bean validation 2.0.0
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6529] - Feedback from onSubmit not rendered on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> stateless
>>>
>>>> pages
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6530] - Race-condition in session invalidation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ** New Feature
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6497] - unify javascript files
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6498] - wicket 8 - js to asnyc and or defer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ** Improvement
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6055] - AjaxLazyLoadPanel should provide non-blocking
>>>>>>> lazy load
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6284] - Introduce lambda-enhanced factory method in
>>>>>>> ResourceReference
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6499] - Support for Bean Validation 2.0
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6503] - Ajax refresh and feedback panel
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6504] - Use a serializable model for
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> FileSystemResource's
>>>>
>>>>> path
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6509] - Import junit packages as optional
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6514] - FeedbackCollector(Component) should not
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> collect
>>>
>>>> session-scoped feedback messages
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6517] - use Ajax for multipart instead of iframe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ** Task
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      * [WICKET-6148] - Remove AjaxEventBehavior#onCheckEvent()
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> before
>>>
>>>> Wicket 8.0.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>

Reply via email to