Hi Thorsten, please take a look at https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/issues/680
Sven Am 2. Oktober 2019 08:45:58 MESZ schrieb "Thorsten Schöning" <tschoen...@am-soft.de>: >Guten Tag Sven Meier, >am Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2019 um 20:53 schrieben Sie: > >> Actually you could argue whether it is practical that these events >> are not delivered to invisible or disabled components by default - >> something I wouldn't expect, since it requires to override >> #canCallListener() or a clever solution like yours. > >+1, I was suprised as well in the past. AnnotationEventDispatcher is >some kind of opt-in in the end already, so one can argue it should not >care if to publish events or not at all. If receivers of events want >to ignore some based on aspects like visibility of a component, if >it's enabled or not etc., they could check that in the event handler >on their own. Would have the benefit of being able to check that for >each and every individual event (handler) as well. > >> IMHO we should make this configurable[...] > >Such a configuration has been explicitly removed in the past in favour >of calling "canCallListener": > >https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/commit/f2ee61fb48259f9bdbf682713b12738e596d3cc1#diff-e8dc60d585cc63b237e8bb83a2814c3b >https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/commit/f2ee61fb48259f9bdbf682713b12738e596d3cc1#diff-e1aa43fd3aadd18631700c7dd4c63179 > >So it might be worth it to consider re-introducing that configuration >again, but with a changed default of "true" to send to invisible >components. > >Mit freundlichen Grüßen, > >Thorsten Schöning > >-- >Thorsten Schöning E-Mail: thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de >AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ > >Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 >Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 >Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 > >AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln >AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow
