Hi Sven and Andrea!
I'd suggest pure CSS popup handled by wicket ajax. Maybe very simple js to
add some class to the body (for example to add a blur).
```
<div id="popup" class="open">
<i class="icon-window-close" id="popup__close"></i>
<div class="popup__outer">
<div id="popup__content">
<div>My beautiful popup content</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
```
```
body.has-popup {
overflow: hidden;
}
body.has-popup>.container {
filter: blur(5px);
overflow: hidden;
}
#popup {
overflow-y: auto;
}
#popup__close {
display: none;
}
#popup__content {
max-width: 700px;
margin: 0 auto;
background: #222222AA;
padding: 10px;
}
#popup.open {
position: fixed;
width: 100vw; height: 100vh;
left: 0; top: 0;
}
#popup.open .popup__outer {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
flex-direction: column;
min-height: 100%;
margin-bottom: 50px; /* fix issue with chrome control bar */
}
#popup.open #popup__close {
position: fixed;
top: 20px; right: 20px;
font-size: 200%;
display: block;
}
#popup.open #popup__close:before {
text-shadow: 0 0 10px grey;
}
*```*
чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 04:41, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net>:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> sorry my mistake, the most recent issue on this topic is:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6666
>
> And there are two branches actually with Igor's (WICKET-6666_modal-dialog)
> and my (WICKET-6666_modal-dialog-2) proposal respectively.
>
> IMHO we should try to find a very simple solution for the common middle
> ground that
> - supports more than just alert dialogs, e.g. forms
> - doesn't impose huge markup on users
> - doesn't need much if configuration
> - isn't a one-fits-all component (we'll fail with that anyway)
> - is Wicket-y, e.g server rendered, no JS required and simple
>
> Have fun
> Sven
>
>
>
> Am 20. November 2019 15:48:24 MEZ schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
> an.delb...@gmail.com>:
> >To be clear, changes for WICKET-3404 are on branch
> >'WICKET-6666_modal-dialog-2'?
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:13 PM Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you !
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 8:58 PM Andrew Kondratev <and...@kondratev.pro>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>> Please let me know if you need further assistance with WICKET-6703
> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> or WICKET-3404
> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Andrew
> >>>
> >>> ср, 20 нояб. 2019 г. в 06:49, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net>:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi Andrea,
> >>> >
> >>> > both issues are ready.
> >>> >
> >>> > Andrew and I have put a lot of effort into WICKET-6703, which IMHO
> >is a
> >>> > really nice improvement for Wicket 9.
> >>> >
> >>> > Have fun
> >>> > Sven
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On 19.11.19 12:10, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> >>> > > Personally I'd rather target both issues for Wicket 9. It's my
> >>> > > understanding that WICKET-6703
> >>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> is nearly
> >>> > completed, so
> >>> > > we might consider to merge its feature branch. Correct me if I'm
> >>> wrong.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:06 PM Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net>
> >wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> Hi Andrea,
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> IMHO we should decide WICKET-6703 "eval" first:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Either we stop that endeavour or it has to go into Wicket 9.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Personally I'd like to have progress on WICKET-3404 "modal
> >window"
> >>> too:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3404
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Have fun
> >>> > >> Sven
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On 14.11.19 10:07, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> >>> > >>> WDYT? :-)
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >--
> >Andrea Del Bene.
> >Apache Wicket committer.
>
