Just as a brainstorm. Not sure if it's a good idea.

Wicket potentially can add nounced style to the document with hidden
elements hidden by id.

Imagine generated HTML has components like these
<div class="wupb-container">
        <div class="wupb-progressBar" id="ida"><div
class="wupb-border"><div class="wupb-background"><div
class="wupb-foreground"></div></div></div></div>
        <div class="wupb-uploadStatus" id="id9"></div>
    </div>

#ida and #id9 must be hidden, so in the page header we add something like
this

<style nonce="abracadabra">
#ida, #id9 {display: none;}
</style>

Even if the  wupb-progressBar  has display: flex, the #ida will win. Will
win even over  #id8 .wupb-progressBar {display: fles}

!important can potentially be added.


чт, 27 февр. 2020 г. в 23:56, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <reier...@gmail.com
>:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:33 PM Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:26 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Right now I have no enough knowledge to vote in this feature. One
> thing I
> > > didn't like, and I already mentioned it before, is some of us were
> > waiting
> > > for 9.x to be released some time ago (at least a few months ago I was
> > > preparing some branch of our application and ported it to 9.x, after
> > asking
> > > about release plans) and all of the sudden this feature is introduced
> and
> > > all sub-frameworks depending on Wicket will have to be adapted.
> >
> >
> > In which way sub-frameworks should be affected? I mean, as far as I
> > understand it, if we disable CSP blocking configuration everything should
> > work "the old way", and that's why I would prefer to keep CSP disabled by
> > default.
> >
>
> Well if something is supported at core level then if associated projects
> want to comply with this new feature, which might be ideal,  then they will
> have to be adapted (or not?). I'm not talking about not releasing the new
> feature. I'm talking about not releasing as part of 9.x, as it was said to
> be almost ready for release a few months ago, and deffer it to 10.x (and
> try to release it soon).
>
> --
> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>

Reply via email to