On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:19 PM Emond Papegaaij <emond.papega...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +0 to release > > The rewrite I'm currently doing is API compatible. I'm nearly finished > though, so if we can wait one more day, I should be able to get it all > working. > If it is API compatible then it can be added in 9.0.1 I really do not want to add such changes in the last moment. Better add it once 9.0.0 is released and we can test it before 9.0.1. > Emond > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:07 PM Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote: > > > > +1 we have to cut it somewhere > > > > Sven > > > > > > On 30.04.20 11:57, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > > > +1 to release. The current state of 9.x is very stable and IMHO it > > > shouldn't be delayed for major developments or refactoring. > > > > > > On 30/04/20 10:04, Tobias Soloschenko wrote: > > >> +1 - lets release > > >> > > >> kind regards > > >> > > >> Tobias > > >> > > >>> Am 30.04.2020 um 09:43 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik < > solomax...@gmail.com>: > > >>> > > >>> +1 > > >>> let's release final version :) > > >>> > > >>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 14:40, Martin Grigorov > > >>>> <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi team, > > >>>> > > >>>> Few weeks have passed since Wicket 9.0.0-M5 and there are no > > >>>> stopper issues > > >>>> being reported. > > >>>> Let's release 9.0.0! > > >>>> > > >>>> I see few of you discuss refactoring some pretty critical area (from > > >>>> performance PoV) of Wicket - the Component state, and suggesting > some > > >>>> bigger refactoring. I'd like this refactoring to be left for a later > > >>>> release. If there are no API breaks it could be 9.0.1 but if there > > >>>> will API > > >>>> breaks then it will have to wait for Wicket 10. > > >>>> > > >>>> WDYT ? > > >>>> > > >>>> Martin > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Best regards, > > >>> Maxim >
