+1 I'm also for keeping it out of 8. If there's no objection I will start the new rollout asap.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 10:16 PM Emond Papegaaij <emond.papega...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree. It would have been nice to have it backported to 8, but it's > not a big deal and not worth the effort of backporting all those other > things. > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 9:18 PM Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2021, 18:47 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Let it be 9.x exclusive feature? :)) > > > > > > > Actually, CSP, COEP & COOP are 9.x only. So, security enhancements go > only > > to 9.x :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 at 23:44, Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I think it's time to work on the next release cycle. Let me know if > you > > > > wish to finish any task before proceeding. Speaking of which...I'm > not > > > sure > > > > what to do with WICKET-6864. Initially I wanted to port it to > wicket-8x > > > but > > > > the task is everything but trivial. Wicket 8 doesn't have the > security > > > > configuration part to use a centralized random number generator and > I'm > > > not > > > > sure we can port everything back without breaking api compatibility. > > > > We might apply the initial commit Sven did for this task (see the > link > > > > below) but I'm not sure if such a watered-down compromise is worth > it. > > > And > > > > I would avoid to delay the next release too long just for this task. > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/462/commits/7bc47ec03cbbf273570ae72b535fa4663024737e > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Andrea Del Bene. > > > > Apache Wicket committer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Maxim > > > > -- Andrea Del Bene. Apache Wicket committer.
