On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:17 AM Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote:
> I made a small fix in the doap file - > https://github.com/apache/wicket-site/pull/15 > > Does the file have to start with YAML - > https://github.com/apache/wicket-site/blob/eb26085e15759da6b9510c56942b8b232a7a4e11/doap.rdf#L1-L3 > ? > The content is a XML but the YAML header bothers me ... > All is good! https://github.com/apache/wicket-site/blob/asf-site/*content*/doap.rdf looks OK and https://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ confirms it! > On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 6:08 PM Martijn Dashorst < > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> There was some rumblings that a lot of projects don't have a DOAP file >> (which is processed by https://projects.apache.org) and when I looked at >> our description on projects.a.o it noted: >> >> 6.19.0 (2015-02-02): Latest Stable Release >> >> Which is AFAIK incorrect :-D >> >> It appears that the DOAP registration points to the SVN repository of our >> site publishing thing, which hasn't been in use since at last 2 February >> 2015, 8 years ago. >> >> This should be fixed in the projects.a.o administration to point to our >> DOAP file that's published on the website ( >> https://wicket.apache.org/doap.rdf), and I think the SCM location should >> also be changed from subversion to something git like. >> > > Do you know where this change has to be done ? > To answer myself: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/trunk/data/projects.xml > > >> >> The projects.a.o site: https://projects.apache.org/project.html?wicket >> >> Any takers? >> >> Martijn >> >
