+1 kind regards
Tobias > Am 09.09.2026 um 13:36 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>: > > + 1 . Just one more doubt about Java support. Shall we stay "one step > beyond " Java LTS? i.e not use the very last LTS (now 25) but the > previous one (now 21) and upgrade to 25 when the next LTS is out (Java > 29 if I'm right) > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 9:59 PM Emond Papegaaij <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It seems we all agree on a new release schedule, so I propose to move >> forward. I'll draft a mail to be sent to the Wicket Users list (and I think >> we should also include announce) to announce our change in releases. In >> short: >> * We will release 4 new versions soon (proposal: first week of October): >> 11.0.0, 10.11.0, 9.24.0 and 8.19.0. >> * For 8.x and 9.x, these will be the last releases, no more support after >> that. >> * 10.x will be our first LTS line, supported until 14 is released. >> * From now on, we release a new major version every 3 months, so the next >> will be in the first week of January. >> >> Any objections? >> >> Emond >> >> Op vr 4 sep 2026 om 09:08 schreef Vít Rozkovec <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi, >>> having used wicket for around 15 years since 1.4 or so, can't even >>> remember, and managing multiple mission critical business projects for >>> multiple companies, I also agree with more frequent releases. >>> So far wicket updates and upgrades were usually smooth for us. I don't >>> have any bad memories regarding that. >>> >>> What I'd like to propose though is to bump version to 26 so it follows >>> year of release, like Ubuntu does. >>> Then you would have 26.0.0, 26.04.0, 26.08.0, 26.12.0, 27.0.0, etc. >>> which would follow release year/month. >>> You'd also know that x.0.x are LTS releases. >>> >>> With more frequent release schedule it would make things more clear, imho. >>> >>> Just my 2c. >>> >>> Vit >>> >>> Dne 03. 09. 26 v 20:29 Martijn Dashorst napsal(a): >>>> On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 at 18:15, Emond Papegaaij <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Today Martijn Dashorst, Matt Pavlovich, Jonathan Locke and I had a short >>>>> call to discuss our ideas about a renewed release schedule. >>>> >>>> Great talk, we should do that more often. >>>> >>>> Just one clarification: >>>> >>>> One clarification I think we should make explicit: a non-LTS release is >>>> supported only until the next major release. >>>> >>>> During that 3-month window, it can receive normal patch or minor releases >>>> when needed. So 12 could get a 12.0.1 for a bugfix or a 12.1 for a >>>> compatible feature. >>>> >>>> Once 13.0 is released, 12 is EOL and will not receive any further >>> releases. >>>> >>>> LTS releases are the exception: they continue to receive the agreed LTS >>>> support after newer majors are released. >>>> >>>> Also these releases are time boxed so regular and small. If something is >>>> not ready, it goes into the next one. >>>> >>>> Martijn >>>> >>> >>> > > > > -- > Andrea Del Bene. > Apache Wicket committer.
