My vote: C, B

Emond

Op wo 21 okt 2026 om 13:44 schreef Daniel Bartl <[email protected]>:

> Hi Martijn,
>
> many thanks for your time and effort!
>
> My vote: C, B, D.
>
> Daniel
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2026, at 12:51 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > TL;DR: there's a vote at the end of this message.
> >
> > I have done considerable work on what I think is a significant
> improvement
> > over the old site. This restructure is now live on
> https://wicket.apache.org,
> > but I want the site to go further.
> >
> > First what is already achieved, I have restructured the site to:
> > - have fewer top level menu items
> > - give the blog more prominence
> > - have community capture both support and contribute
> > - give ASF and a link to our Github repo prominence (not that we value GH
> > over
> >   ASF, but we don't want people /have/ to look for the link)
> > - have documentation according to Diataxis (How-to's, Tutorials,
> Explainers
> >   and References)
> > - have search to our documentation, including a glossary, index, and more
> > - give each release line (wicket-10.x, wicket-9.x, wicket-8.x, etc) their
> > own page
> > - update the blog to be categorized with each release line, and also
> > featured posts
> > - give every release line page the facts you look for: its status, the
> date
> >   support ends, the Maven dependency with a copy button, requirements,
> >   downloads and how to upgrade to the next line
> > - use one vocabulary for release status everywhere: LTS, Current and end
> of
> >   life, instead of "for production" and "for new features"
> > - put the newest release in the menu, leading to its line's page
> > - bring back the quick start wizard, under Releases
> > - link the reference guide (one page and PDF) and the Javadoc of every
> >   release line from the documentation
> > - write the guide as about 140 pages by topic and kind, each marked with
> the
> >   Wicket version it applies to
> > - teach the search the release vocabulary, so "LTS" or "10" finds the
> right
> >   page
> > - put questions, bug reports, reporting a vulnerability and the mailing
> > lists
> >   on one Community page
> > - sort the contributor documentation by kind under /contribute/
> > - give long pages an "On this page" rail beside the text
> > - give the homepage a Get started button, the release lines in the hero,
> the
> >   featured blog posts right below it, a page shown as its Java and its
> HTML,
> >   and the newest Built with Wicket showcases
> > - make the release tables and the homepage work on phones
> > - add a site footer, a 404 page that helps you on your way, and an
> llms.txt
> >   for AI assistants
> >
> > What's next:
> >
> > On top of the new structure I made three new designs, to make the site
> > fresher and more modern. Each has an introduction on the homepage that
> shows
> > how Wicket works; Ribbon also has a separate page that builds one page in
> > seven steps, which I intend to extend to explain more concepts visually:
> > https://dashorst.github.io/wicket-site/ribbon-site/start/overview.html
> >
> > The previews show the content as it will be on release day (11.0.0 and
> > 10.12.0 out), so some dates are in the future.
> >
> > These are the choices:
> > A - Current: https://dashorst.github.io/wicket-site/structure/
> > B - Departure board:
> https://dashorst.github.io/wicket-site/departure-board/
> > C - Reveal: https://dashorst.github.io/wicket-site/reveal-site/
> > D - Ribbon: https://dashorst.github.io/wicket-site/ribbon-site/
> > E - Other, ...
> >
> > Please rank the choices in order of preference, most preferred first, for
> > example "D, B, A". You don't have to rank every choice. If you choose E,
> say
> > what you have in mind.
> >
> > Everyone is welcome to vote, and in the case of a split decision, the PMC
> > votes
> > will be binding. The vote runs for at least 72 hours. I'll count it as an
> > instant
> > runoff: the choice with the fewest first preferences drops out and its
> > votes go to
> > their next choice, until one choice has a majority.
> >
> > Onwards to Wicket 11 and beyond! Check the proposals and  give us your
> > preference(s)!
> >
> > Martijn
> >

Reply via email to