On 4 Feb 2013, at 09:26, Paul Sharples wrote:

> On 03/02/2013 16:03, Scott Wilson wrote:
>> Thanks Paul, I just downloaded them all and tried them out.
>> 
>> Standalone
>> =========
>> Verified signature: good!
>> Untars fine, with right folder name.
>> LICENSE looks OK
>> NOTICE: possible problem with Santuario (see below)
>> sh startup.sh: works fine
>> 
>> War
>> ===
>> Verified signature: good!
>> Untars fine, with right folder name.
>> LICENSE looks OK
>> NOTICE: possible problem with Santuario (see below)
>> Running: followed instructions, and it works fine using MySQL 5.1 + Tomcat 
>> 7.0.35
>> 
>> Src
>> ===
>> Verified signature: good!
>> Untars fine, with right folder name.
>> LICENSE looks OK
>> NOTICE looks OK
>> ant run:  works fine
>> 
>> ====
>> I just had a look at Santuario, and it has a NOTICE[1] - doesn't this text 
>> need to be reproduced in the Wookie NOTICE for the standalone binary? If so 
>> we need to append it to the war and standalone NOTICE and rebuild these 
>> artefacts.
>> 
>> This doesn't affect the src distribution.
> 
> I'd assumed that because Santuario fell under the Apache 2.0 licence we 
> didn't need it.  However I'm not sure.

I'm going to assume that we do need to do this, but that this only affects the 
binaries. I suggest that we re-package and stage the binaries with a modified 
NOTICE including XmlSec. 

Let me know when the binaries are updated and I'll review them again.

> 
> Paul
> 
>> 
>> S
>> 
>> [1] 
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/santuario/xml-security-java/trunk/NOTICE?view=markup
>> 
>> On 1 Feb 2013, at 09:36, Paul Sharples wrote:
>> 
>>> Discussion thread for the vote on the 0.13.0 release candidate.
>>> 
>>> For more information on the release process, checkout - 
>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>> 
>>> Some of the things to check before voting are:
>>> - can you run the demo binaries
>>> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
>>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE and NOTICE 
>>> files
>>> - are all of the staged artifacts signed and the signature verifiable
>>> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
>>> 
> 

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to