*Pushpalanka Jayawardhana *Software Engineer WSO2 Lanka (pvt) Ltd +94 779716248 [image: Facebook] <http://www.facebook.com/pushpalanka> [image: LinkedIn]<http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=75175642&trk=tab_pro> [image: Twitter] <http://twitter.com/Pushpalanka> [image: SlideShare]<http://www.slideshare.net/Pushpalanka> [image: Blogger] <http://pushpalankajaya.blogspot.com/>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Scott Wilson < [email protected]> wrote: > Though there is nothing "wrong" with how the project files are organised > at the moment, I think it would be easier for newcomers if we used the > Maven standard directory layout conventions [1]. This will also make it > easier to migrate to using Maven for building the project later on if we > choose to go down that route. > > So > > src > src-test > WebContent > > ... becomes > > src/main/java > src/test/java > src/main/webapp > +1. It will be easy for beginners. +1 if migration to Maven is to happen too. It will be helpful for beginners to get in soon. It needed more time to understand the ivy.xml and ant scripts, than for a Maven pom.xml as I felt.(Just my personal experience.) > > (same for the Java Connector, DigSig-Client and Parser sub-projects) > > I've tested this locally using "svn mv" and can get Wookie to build and > deploy using the new directory layout; unless there are any objections I'll > commit the changes on Friday. > > S > > [1] > http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html
