On 24 Jan 2014, at 12:22, Paul Sharples wrote: > > On 24/01/2014 10:11, Scott Wilson wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I think its time we talked about the future direction for Wookie. >> >> Right now we have pretty good stability of the current codebase, so much so >> that I'm personally loath to make any changes given how well it seems to >> perform. >> >> However, I think we do want to make some pretty big changes, such as: >> >> - moving from internal db storage to a service provider interface design >> - replacing persistent widget instances with Shindig-style encrypted tokens >> - moving from simple API keys to a more robust access token system for API >> access >> - replacing DWR with another solution for data sharing >> - moving from Ant to Maven for build and deployment >> >> To move forward I think we need to make the current codebase a stable >> release branch, only updated for critical bugfixes and security updates, >> while we move onto working on a 2.0 release in trunk. >> >> What do you think? > > +1 from me. I think this sounds like a sensible plan. Some of the things we > have been discussing for a while (such as replacing DWR) are major changes, > so a new v2.0 development branch seems the logical way forward, while keeping > our current version alive.
So do you think it would be better to have the stable version in trunk, and do 2.0x as a branch? > > Paul > >> >> S >
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
