I tend to agree with Dan here. It would have made sense when 2.0 was released. When Benson proposed it a year ago, it was already very late. I think that now it is really too late.
Andreas On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, I more or less object now. CXF has used it for well over a year now > and renaming the packages now would certainly break a few things for our > users. > > Dan > > > > On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 06:01:12 PM Sagara Gunathunga wrote: >> Folks, >> >> We are thinking to upgrade Axis2 trunk into XMLSchema2 but due to >> insufficient test coverage on Axis2 side it's take more time and required >> more works to reach there. It would be great if we can keep both versions >> as dependencies until we finish the job completely. >> >> Since there is no objection to do the package renaming shall we do it on >> trunk ? >> >> If we agree on above I suggest "org.apache.ws.xmlschema.*" as the new >> package name WDYT ? any better suggestions ? >> >> If Benson is busy with other stuff I can spend sometime on this hope SVN >> move followed by source file editing will work here. >> >> >> Thanks ! >> >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Benson > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
