On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Marc Giger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:08:56 +0100 > Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> WSS4J 2.0 will support streaming WS-Security as well as the existing DOM >> based implementation. This will allow a web service to implement >> WS-Security with a low memory footprint, albeit with a slight performance >> tradeoff. > > ...albeit with a slight performance tradeoff for small SOAP-Documents... :-)
Is there some information (with empirical data) available about the relative performance of both implementations? >> >> Colm. >> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > Hi Colm, >> > >> > What can we expect in 2.0? >> > >> > Thank you, >> > Gary >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected] >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> WSS4J trunk has now moved to 2.0-SNAPSHOT, and I have moved the artifacts >> >> from the SWSSF branch over. >> >> >> >> Colm. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Colm O hEigeartaigh >> >> >> >> Talend Community Coder >> >> http://coders.talend.com >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 >> > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK >> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> > Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Colm O hEigeartaigh >> >> Talend Community Coder >> http://coders.talend.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
