Hi Fazlan,

IMO we need to also mention this in the ML migration doc from 1.0.0 to
1.1.0.

Regards,
Nira

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Fazlan Nazeem <fazl...@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi Tishan,
>
> This is an expected behaviour since we have changed the model classes in
> ML 1.1.0.
>
> @Rukshani can you please document this under [1].
>
> [1]
> https://docs.wso2.com/display/ML110/WSO2+CEP+Extension+for+ML+Predictions
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Tishan Dahanayakage <tis...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> ML models built with ML 1.0.0 is not compatible with ML 1.1.0. If we try
>> to use a model build with 1.0.0 against ML 1.1.0 features following
>> exception is generated. Came across this when testing ML extension for CEP.
>>
>>
>> org.wso2.carbon.event.processor.core.exception.ExecutionPlanConfigurationException:
>> org.wso2.siddhi.core.exception.ExecutionPlanCreationException: Error while
>> retrieving ML-model :
>> registry:/_system/governance/2.Model.2015-12-22_19-47-59
>> org.wso2.carbon.ml.core.spark.models.MLGeneralizedLinearModel; local
>> class incompatible: stream classdesc serialVersionUID =
>> -1410218250358516850, local class serialVersionUID = 8020448562088344988 in
>> execution plan "ExecutionPlanML"
>> at
>> org.wso2.carbon.event.processor.core.internal.util.helper.EventProcessorHelper.validateExecutionPlan(EventProcessorHelper.java:193)
>> ...
>> Caused by: org.wso2.siddhi.core.exception.ExecutionPlanCreationException:
>> Error while retrieving ML-model :
>> registry:/_system/governance/2.Model.2015-12-22_19-47-59
>> org.wso2.carbon.ml.core.spark.models.MLGeneralizedLinearModel; local
>> class incompatible: stream classdesc serialVersionUID =
>> -1410218250358516850, local class serialVersionUID = 8020448562088344988
>> at
>> org.wso2.carbon.ml.siddhi.extension.PredictStreamProcessor.logError(PredictStreamProcessor.java:350)
>> at
>> org.wso2.carbon.ml.siddhi.extension.PredictStreamProcessor.init(PredictStreamProcessor.java:187)
>> ... 82 more
>>
>> Is this expected behavior? If so ​I think we need to mention that models
>> are not backward compatible in docs.​
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tishan Dahanayakage
>> Software Engineer
>> WSO2, Inc.
>> Mobile:+94 716481328
>>
>> Disclaimer: This communication may contain privileged or other
>> confidential information and is intended exclusively for the addressee/s.
>> If you are not the intended recipient/s, or believe that you may have
>> received this communication in error, please reply to the sender indicating
>> that fact and delete the copy you received and in addition, you should not
>> print, copy, re-transmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information
>> contained in this communication. Internet communications cannot be
>> guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not
>> accept liability for any errors or omissions.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> Dev@wso2.org
>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Fazlan Nazeem
>
> *Software Engineer*
>
> *WSO2 Inc*
> Mobile : +94772338839
> <%2B94%20%280%29%20773%20451194>
> fazl...@wso2.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev@wso2.org
> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>


-- 

*Niranjan Karunanandham*
Senior Software Engineer - WSO2 Inc.
WSO2 Inc.: http://www.wso2.com
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to