Hi Akila, Please check the modified code. It now takes the value which is specified as localMemberPort in axis2.xml.
Thanks, On Tuesday, July 5, 2016, Akila Ravihansa Perera <raviha...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hi Osura, > > As Isuru mentioned you need to be clear about tenantId since it might > conflict with Carbon tenantId. As suggested, please rename it to something > like AZURE_TENANT_ID or something like that. > > Regarding localMemberPort in axis2.xml, the value of this parameter should > be same in all nodes by convention therefore no need read localMemberPort > parameter value in each member's axis2.xml. When adding members to > Hazelcast config context you need to take the value of this parameter. > Because we cannot guarantee that it will be 4000 in every deployment. There > are some special cases in which we need to change this. Have a look at [1] > to see how this is handled in Mesos membership scheme. > > [1] > https://github.com/wso2/mesos-artifacts/blob/master/common/mesos-membership-scheme/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/clustering/mesos/MesosMembershipScheme.java#L247 > > Thanks. > -- Regards, Osura Rathnayake
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
