Hi Farasath, The logic behind returning claims in 'oidc' is based on the intersection of both sp requested claims and the registry defined claims for the scope. So in order to return a specific claims it should define in the registry and it should define as a requested claims.
2. Improve the fix[2] to return all claims for *openid *flow only when > service provider has no requested claims. > > So why do we need to return all the claims for openid flow when the SP has no requested claims? Thanks, Hasanthi Dissanayake Software Engineer | WSO2 E: hasan...@wso2.com M :0718407133| http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com/> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Rushmin Fernando <rush...@wso2.com> wrote: > yes, we should get rid of unwanted processing. > > IMO we should honour the configured requested claims in the service > provider. But I'm not aware whether there was a need to send all the claims > for open id. > > > > On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Farasath Ahamed <farasa...@wso2.com> > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> In the current implementation of the DefaultClaimHandler[1] claim >> handling logic involves the below steps when retrieving claims for local >> and federated scenarios, >> >> 1. Loading local claims and claims mappings >> 2. Loading all non-empty claims of the user >> >> #1 involves several DB calls where as step #2 results in a call to the >> user store which means either a DB call or LDAP/AD call depending on the >> user store configured. >> >> Here are few shortcoming I noticed, >> >> 1. If a service provider has configured no requested claims, we >> simply return an empty map of claims after going through the whole process >> #1 and #2. >> 2. For authentication involved with flows like OAuth which do not >> involve claims going through this claims handling logic doesn't make any >> sense. >> >> >> To give an idea of the performance impact, An authentication request >> coming into the Authentication Framework takes about 950ms to complete. Of >> this around 550ms is spent on handling claims (that's close to ~60%). So >> for an OAuth flow with authorization code or implicit flow, this is a >> performance hit. >> >> I initially did a fix for this[2], by returning an empty map of claims if >> the there were no requested claims. But this doesn't seem to work since we >> seem to return all available claims for *openid *flow[3]. >> >> Do we have a specific reason for return all available claims in the >> openid flow? Shouldn't we honour service provider requested claims when >> sending out user claims out of the framework? >> >> >> I have a few improvements in my mind to overcome the problem, >> >> 1. Specifically, check for the *oauth *request type and stop executing >> claim handling logic. >> 2. Improve the fix[2] to return all claims for *openid *flow only when >> service provider has no requested claims. >> >> Do you see any complexities that could arise with the suggested >> improvements? >> >> >> [1] https://github.com/wso2/carbon-identity-framework/blob/m >> aster/components/authentication-framework/org.wso2.carbon.id >> entity.application.authentication.framework/src/main/java/ >> org/wso2/carbon/identity/application/authentication/ >> framework/handler/claims/impl/DefaultClaimHandler.java >> >> [2] https://github.com/wso2/carbon-identity-framework/pull/961 >> >> [3] https://github.com/wso2/carbon-identity-framework/blob/m >> aster/components/authentication-framework/org.wso2.carbon.id >> entity.application.authentication.framework/src/main/java/ >> org/wso2/carbon/identity/application/authentication/ >> framework/handler/claims/impl/DefaultClaimHandler.java#L422 >> >> >> Thanks, >> Farasath Ahamed >> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >> Mobile: +94777603866 >> Blog: blog.farazath.com >> Twitter: @farazath619 <https://twitter.com/farazath619> >> <http://wso2.com/signature> >> >> >> > > > -- > *Best Regards* > > *Rushmin Fernando* > *Technical Lead* > > WSO2 Inc. <http://wso2.com/> - Lean . Enterprise . Middleware > > mobile : +94775615183 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev@wso2.org > http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev > >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev